when I was actively engaged in teaching and developing effective pedagogical technologies in technical universities and educational institutions, I focused on the problem of individualizing the creation of educational material to achieve maximum effectiveness in mastering the material, developing stable skills, and eventually abilities.
An individualized pace, method of presenting material, delivery methodology, assessment approach, analysis methods, and personalization of conclusions became the foundation of my scientific work. One of the key aspects of the "failures" in achieving goals was the short cycles of material assimilation and the rapid transition to skill formation. Such skills provided only a framework understanding of the studied topic and allowed only a narrow set of skills, minimally necessary for the topic, to be consolidated. There were no more than two or three such cycles. These skills were quickly lost because their narrow and infrequent application did not lead to the development of true abilities.
An individualized pace, method of presenting material, delivery methodology, assessment approach, analysis methods, and personalization of conclusions became the foundation of my scientific work. One of the key aspects of the "failures" in achieving goals was the short cycles of material assimilation and the rapid transition to skill formation. Such skills provided only a framework understanding of the studied topic and allowed only a narrow set of skills, minimally necessary for the topic, to be consolidated. There were no more than two or three such cycles. These skills were quickly lost because their narrow and infrequent application did not lead to the development of true abilities.
The reasons for this were many:
Limited time resources for study
Inability to personalize the approach
Uniform model of quality assessment
Lack of opportunities to adapt educational material to the psychological characteristics of individual learners
The reasons for this were many:
Limited time resources for study
Inability to personalize the approach
Uniform model of quality assessment
Lack of opportunities to adapt educational material to the psychological characteristics of individual learners
At that time
I turned to neural networks to assist with some auxiliary tasks and... failed. At that time, the capabilities of neural networks were very limited, which was quite understandable. Technological solutions were not up to the required level, and training such networks always had to start from scratch, requiring enormous resources that were unavailable to me at the time.
At that time
I turned to neural networks to assist with some auxiliary tasks and... failed. At that time, the capabilities of neural networks were very limited, which was quite understandable. Technological solutions were not up to the required level, and training such networks always had to start from scratch, requiring enormous resources that were unavailable to me at the time.
Progress does not stand still
Today, new resources and opportunities have become available, and I was able to implement my scientific solutions in this project. Now, thanks to modern AI models, an individualized approach to learning through a simple LVI cycle is possible and has become an easy-to-use tool to assist teachers and an excellent and effective tool for students and learners.